free web hosting | free website | Business Hosting | Free Website Submission | shopping cart | php hosting

[The following is an excerpt from a letter to Allen Meece]

[Updated 4 September 2002]

 
Using a commercially available, pre-cast PET tank for the crew hab requires us to use a tank with 1.25" walls or thicker to be sure that we have an adequate pressure vessel.  Tanks like this are built to hold >60 tons of liquid under one or more atmospheres of pressure for pumping, so we'll know that it's capable of holding less than an atmosphere of pressure in vacuum.  However, a 3.5m x 6.5m tank of this type weighs 2500kg+ and a 2.5m x 2.5m tank weighs 800kg+ for the tank walls alone.  Metal tanks capable of handling similar pressure weigh even more.
 
Structurally, these tanks are overbuilt for our purposes, being capable of withstanding many times what we would ever ask of our VBP hab.  With the addition of an internal framework to hold flooring and equipment, they have far more wall strength than we need.  They were also never intended to be used with vacuum on one side of the tank wall, so they lack an important feature: double pressure walls. 
 
We know that a simple Spectra (or even even double Dacron) ballute lined with polypropylene will hold atmospheric pressure against a vacuum.  Double its strength, and it would even be marginally suitable as a cabin wall.  Double the polypro layer, and it is effectively double hulled.  Using two sequential gas barriers allows leaked gas to build up between them, spreading the pressure differential across two layers.  It also guards against catastrophic failure of one layer. 
 
By covering a hard-walled tank with a flexible ballute, we would create a double-walled hull with the benefits of both hard and cloth hulls.  It would provide a firm anchor for the hab's pressure doors and interior structure, could resist blows that would crack a hard-walled tank from end to end, and -- most importantly -- be made of much thinner and lighter plastic.  We could probably build a hab of this type using less than 1.5 ton for both module walls, rather than >3.3T.  This represents a considerable savings in weight without any significant loss of structural strength or endurance.
 
CME